 Most politicians are bought and paid for by the highest bidders—those with the money to pour into campaigns through donations and political influence. As a result, those funders often dictate priorities, policies, and outcomes. Meanwhile, the people without excess wealth—the ones overlooked, ignored, or dismissed—are the very people who keep the system running.
The individuals with the greatest needs, who work the hardest for the smallest paychecks, and who lack the financial ability to bankroll a political campaign, are the same individuals who collectively contribute the most in taxes. These are the people struggling to survive, yet their tax dollars fund elected officials’ salaries and the budgets used for city, state, and federal programs. Still, they receive the least representation. This imbalance is not accidental. Those who cannot fund campaigns are systematically excluded from meaningful political influence, even though their money makes up the bulk of public funding. Their issues are treated as irrelevant, their struggles invisible, and their voices disposable. As a result, comprehensive legislation—especially laws that protect communities of color from racism, bias, and systemic harm—becomes nearly impossible to pass when those communities have little to no representation at the decision-making table. Instead of investing tax dollars into addressing root causes—such as healthcare, housing, education, food security, and economic stability—elected officials often choose to spend money expanding systems that generate trauma and profit their allies. Policing, incarceration, and surveillance are funded at the expense of community-based solutions, creating cycles of harm and recidivism rather than safety and opportunity. This raises a fundamental question: why wouldn’t elected officials prioritize the people who unwillingly invest the most into government through taxes? Why wouldn’t they want truly safe, healthy communities for everyone? When communities of color win, society wins—and so should elected officials. Yet the opposite continues to happen. Those who make the least money, yet contribute the most proportionally in taxes, are underrepresented in government. Barriers like filing fees, campaign costs, and donor-driven politics effectively weed out people from poverty who are best positioned to represent their own communities. The very people most affected by policy decisions are blocked from shaping them. So how did we get to a place where public money is used to incarcerate rather than heal? Where poverty is criminalized instead of addressed? Where the majority fund the system but are denied power within it? Until representation reflects those who pay the price—financially and socially—the system will continue to fail the people it claims to serve. Taxation Without Representation Taxation-without-representation.html Past Felony Conviction, Participation, and Political Reintegration in the United States past-felony-conviction-participation-and-political-reintegration-united-states
0 Comments
 Amended Local Rule 9 (2019) was intended to permanently reform Harris County’s misdemeanor bail system. However, Texas Southern District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal issued a court order in November of last year that allowed Texas Attorney General (AG) Ken Paxton to file a motion to vacate the O’Donnell Consent Decree, which oversees Harris County’s compliance with Rule 9. In an upcoming August 27th, 2026 court hearing, Judge Rosenthal will determine the future of misdemeanor bail in Harris County. The AG argues that the Decree is too lenient on crime and in violation of the subsequent Texas Senate Bill (SB) 9. This bill deems defendants charged with certain misdemeanor offenses to be ineligible for personal recognizance (PR) bonds, effectively placing new limits on which types of misdemeanor cases are eligible for pretrial release. Paxton has labeled the Decree as radical and too lenient on crime; his main argument is that certain bail reform procedures within Rule 9 are in contradiction with SB 9; therefore, the Decree should be eradicated completely.
Evidence from the court-appointed monitors of the Decree proves that Local Rule 9 is increasing community stability, as opposed to claims used by the AG to suggest otherwise. After regulating for risk and case type, the share of cases with any re-arrest declined by 5%, and the average number of re-arrests per case fell 12%. Additionally, overall costs declined by more than one-third for statistically similar cases, from an adjusted mean of $3,633 before the O’Donnell Decree to $2,442 after Rule 9. Even more impressive is that the net savings of $1,191 per case are occurring after $544 is being spent to adhere to Rule 9’s mandatory attorney costs and fair pretrial court proceedings. In order to preserve the success of the Decree, Judge Rosenthal may have to amend Rule 9 to ensure it complies with the specific misdemeanor offenses targeted by SB 9. This would ensure Rule 9’s alignment with state laws—nullifying an attempt to vacate the Decree on the basis of state and federal law contradictions. Since SB 9 only targets a small segment of the misdemeanors covered by Rule 9, it would be misguided to disregard the great progress it has made within Harris County by allowing the AG to vacate it in its entirety. Ultimately, this August it is up to the Texas Southern District Court to decide whether to amend the Decree. However, it is up to us, the people, to use our votes to elect representatives who prioritize evidence-based fairness and justice over unsupported narratives regarding public safety. Written by: London Green Grunau, Sarah. “Judge Opens Door for Texas AG to Argue Why Harris County’s Misdemeanor Bail Reform Should End.” Houston Public Media, University of Houston, 14 Nov. 2025, www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/court/2025/11/13/536003/harris-county-bail-reform-odonnell-consent-decree-ken-paxton Lartey, Jamiles. “As Texas Restricts Cashless Bail, More People Will Be Jailed for Months Based on an Accusation.” The Marshall Project, 28 Feb. 2026, www.themarshallproject.org/2026/02/28/texas-houston-jail-bail-tennessee Towns, L. (2026, March 4). Bail Reform delivers justice, safety, and savings. Public Policy Research Institute. https://ppri.tamu.edu/2026/03/04/odonnell-delivers |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
April 2026
Categories |
RSS Feed
|
|
About UsPure Justice uses community organizing, and civic and electoral engagement as methods help reform institutions and systems that perpetuate social and criminal injustices, and to improve the lives of low-income and working-class families
|
Get In TouchMailing Address
Pure Justice 5380 W. 34th St. 305, Houston, TX, 77092, United States Community Space Address (No Mail Here) Pure Justice 4530 W. 34th St. Suite J, Houston, TX, 77092 (713) 370-7490 [email protected] |
© Pure Justice. All rights reserved.